<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looping collections in C#</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tore.vestues.no/2008/08/04/looping-collections-in-c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tore.vestues.no/2008/08/04/looping-collections-in-c/</link>
	<description>On a quest for the silver bullet..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:43:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Eyde</title>
		<link>http://tore.vestues.no/2008/08/04/looping-collections-in-c/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Eyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tore.vestues.no/2008/08/04/looping-collections-in-c/#comment-259</guid>
		<description>numbers.Select(n =&gt; n &gt; 10).Print();

If I remember my linq correctly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>numbers.Select(n =&gt; n &gt; 10).Print();</p>
<p>If I remember my linq correctly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Einar Ingebrigtsen</title>
		<link>http://tore.vestues.no/2008/08/04/looping-collections-in-c/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Einar Ingebrigtsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tore.vestues.no/2008/08/04/looping-collections-in-c/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Great post!

While reading it, I started thinking. Why is generic handled the way it is today for methods. Today we have to specify the  parameter for the method, when in fact it could really figure this out by itself during compiletime by just looking at the types of the parameters using the type or the returntype. 

I gotta get time to look at Boo, it looks so great. I must admit I find it more interesting than dynamic languages - I&#039;m probably just conservative. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
<p>While reading it, I started thinking. Why is generic handled the way it is today for methods. Today we have to specify the  parameter for the method, when in fact it could really figure this out by itself during compiletime by just looking at the types of the parameters using the type or the returntype. </p>
<p>I gotta get time to look at Boo, it looks so great. I must admit I find it more interesting than dynamic languages &#8211; I&#8217;m probably just conservative. <img src='http://vestues.no/tore/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rune Å</title>
		<link>http://tore.vestues.no/2008/08/04/looping-collections-in-c/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Rune Å</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tore.vestues.no/2008/08/04/looping-collections-in-c/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Bra blogg dette her, men blir det en øl snart?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bra blogg dette her, men blir det en øl snart?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
